
I thought this particular photograph was very interesting and creative. The one house with solar panels is the only house to be bright and colored. This could represent the ability of solar panels to pump electricity throughout the house and power appliances such as bright lights. This also may represent the innovativeness and novelty of solar panel technology because only one house out of them all has it. Because the one house that does have solar panels is the only one to look bright and happy, this image can also be considered a persuasive one. To become bright and happy all the boring, drab grey houses must get solar panels. Individuals viewing this picture may feel as if they should consider getting solar panels.
0 Comments
Posted by
NKirchoff ,
,
11:04 PM

This graphic shows the specific purpose for solar panels. Energy from the solar panels travels through houses using electrical lines to traverse to electric boxes. Then from there, the energy travels throughout the house to power household appliances. The presentation of the house surrounded by a green field in a rural area can support the fact that solar power is a more green and sustainable method of obtaining energy to power ones house.
Posted by
NKirchoff ,
,
10:52 PM

This photograph shows a generic picture of solar panels. There is not much information you can obtain from this picture except perhaps that solar panels are usually found in the sun. There is no information as to their purpose or how the panels may affect the environment.
Posted by
NKirchoff ,
,
Thursday, October 14, 2010
7:59 AM
Objective:
The objective of this study was to observe how people interact with their mobile devices and how it affects their interaction with people around them. It is also to find out in what situations people tend to use their mobile devices and how their engagement with the devices differs in different situations.
Study:
For our study, we went to different places around campus, a dining hall, library, lecture hall, and bus stop, and took note of multiple things. The items we observed were gender, type of device being used, how long they were using the device, and whether or not they with other people. We took a sampling of about 20 people for each location in order to get a snapshot of the situation. After the data was collected, we collaborated and shared our information to find different trends within the data.
Discussion:
The bus stop was a location that practically had everyone by themselves if they were using a mobile device. The one person that was recorded as being with people was talking to his friend on the phone trying to find where she was. When they found each other he ended he no longer used a mobile device. This may coincided with the statement that people feel awkward when waiting by themselves and so they feel the need to use some type of mobile technology to make it appear that they are busy or engaged. At the bus stop there were absolutely no laptops being used. The mobile devices that were recorded were MP3s and cellphones. There were eleven out of twenty people using cell phones and nine out of twenty people using their cell phone. This is a pretty even split, and so these device are both acceptable to be using at a bus stop while alone. Laptops are probably too clunky to be using at a bus stop and you may need more time to work on your laptop, but the buses arrive pretty quickly. Most of the non-call activity we saw lasted about 15 to 30 seconds. It appeared to be people replying to text messages. One girl was actually texting as she walked on to the bus so we were only able to get a 30 second time from her. The longest non-call use at the bus stop was a girl who appeared to be checking her email on her phone for about two minutes. The bust stop was also very interesting because it was observed that even though they were not using their cell phones, a lot people were just holding their cell phones in their hands if they were alone. Perhaps they want to create the illusion that they are waiting for someone’s text or someone’s call to make them feel less awkward about being alone.
The Mall was another location that had a decent amount of alone individuals using a mobile device. Fifteen out of twenty people using a mobile device were alone. Actually, data collection at the Mall was a lot more difficult than at other locations. Not many people were using mobile devices here. A good amount of the individuals at the mall were actually outside to enjoy the weather! There were some people playing Frisbee and some others just lying out in the grass. For the Information 3.0 class were always talking about how people are constantly using technology, so It was nice to see people just hanging out outside. The device most used in this location was the cell phone, and all of these individuals were alone. Perhaps people just want a location to talk on the their phone in relative privacy. There are a lot of random spots on the Mall that people can go to to talk on their phones. Also, there was a girl that spent a total of 5 min and 30 seconds on her cell phone texting. She appeared to be on her cigarette break and also employed the habit of leaving her cell phone in her hand awaiting the next text. There was one individual on the phone for 2 minutes and 50 seconds that appeared to be texting and browsing. There was actually a person that seemed to be gaming on his cell phone for about 2 minutes. A new device that was recorded here was one person with a camera and this may be because the Mall is really pretty and they wanted to catch snapshots of it.
For the library we recorded just one more person in order to make the subjects observed an even twenty. It was a female alone and using her laptop, which enforces what we said about people using laptops alone at the library. For the data we collected at the library 12 out of 20 people appeared to be alone while using their devices. This may be an indication of the necessity to use devices while alone to appear less socially awkward or simply because people feel that they study and get more work done if they work alone at the library. Sixteen out of 20 people were using laptops. This may be supported by the fact that the library is a place most come to get their work done and it’s the laptop that has Word as well as the internet to help people right papers and complete assignments. Many college assignments are actually posted on the Internet for students to complete and turn in. Only three individuals were listening to an MP3 player. Many people may not be able to focus on homework and listen to music at the same time. Also, all the MP3 players were alone and not interacting with other people. This can correspond to the fact that it may be difficult to listen to headphones and chat with a friend at the same time. Finally, the only non-call activity on a cell phone that occurred was a girl taking down a guy’s number, and this only lasted about twenty seconds. That was the only cell phone that was seen while in the library. Maybe people don’t want to talk on the cell phone for fear of disturbing other’s studying and the library is usually a place of study, so individuals may not want to play on their cell phone; they want to get their work done.
While observing people on their mobile devices in both the dining hall and a lecture hall before class started, we noticed some trends. The first trend, which was the most obvious, was that people who were alone, both in the dining and lecture halls, generally used their devices more than people who were with someone else. This includes devices such as cell phones, laptops, and mp3 devices. This trend was found across both genders. Social rules might be what dictated this data. In the article, ‘Cell phones in public: social interactions in a wireless era,’ there is mention of social rules. Things like talking on the phone while with someone else is mentioned in the article and is discussed in multiple ways. When a friend is on a phone, the other person is felt left out and can feel uncomfortable. This could be one of the reasons as to why only people who were alone were engaging with their cell phones and mp3 players.
The next trend that was found was that most people listening to mp3 devices while in the lecture hall had Apple products. Most people listening to music had the iPod touch device, while some were still using the iPod classic. While in the dining hall, the iPod touches were being used more for non-music activities. This particular piece of data was not too surprising due to the increasing popularity of Apple products. It is also not surprising because according to an article from Cnet News, one in five people under the age of 30 own an iPod or some form of mp3 player. The article also stated that people who use the Internet, which is every college student, are four times more likely to have an mp3 player. So it is not surprising that so many people had iPods or other mp3 players.
Another thing we noticed about the people who were not alone and on their devices is that they were also interacting with the people with whom they sat. In the dining hall, it appeared as though the people in small groups were studying together, with their laptops out, while in the lecture hall, they were just socializing while using their computers at the same time. This is always going to be this way because lecture halls are not areas of group study while places with large tables like a dining hall or a library are better equipped for groups studying together for longer periods of time.
Sources:
Humphreys, Lee. ‘Cellphones in public: social interactions in a wireless era.’ 2005, New Media Society
Posted by
NKirchoff ,
,
Sunday, October 3, 2010
11:33 PM
Do animals deserve privacy?

Nature documentaries such as B.B.C’s “Nature’s Great Events” videotape animals in all aspects of life including when they’re eating, mating, or dying. Brett Mills, a lecturer in film studies at the University of East Anglia, believes that filming animals during activities that we humans view as privacy-worthy such as giving birth and mating is unethical. Mills argues that some animals indicate a desire for privacy by hiding themselves during intimate acts. One example in particular is when a narwhal whale escaped under an Arctic ice sheet for privacy, but the documenters followed it anyway. Mills states that “instead of thinking we’ll leave it alone, film-makers decide the only solution is to develop new technology so they can film it”. Some of this technology includes microscopic and aerial cameras. Mills compares sneaking a pinhole camera into a bird’s nest to humans being a sort of animal Big Brother.
Mills equates filming birds in their private nesting places to CCTV. CCTVs are closed-circuit television cameras that are used mainly for human surveillance and receive arguments from opponents that these surveillance cameras infringe on privacy rights. The BBC show uses state of the art equipment to catch video of rare and hard to find animals such as humpback whales, cheetahs, and polar bears. Mills acknowledges that consent from animals is difficult to determine, but he believes if animals engage in ‘secretive’ behavior such as running away or burrowing underground, this is an indication that an animal is enacting their right to privacy.
In response to Mills claims, BBC’s Natural History unit says that filming technology is being constantly updated in order to minimize disruption toward the animals being filmed. Their film-makers also work very close with scientists who study the complex lives of animals in hopes of improving wildlife conservation. Natural history documentaries are important in spreading understanding of animal life and informing the world of precious, endangered species. These films increase awareness of the importance of preserving ecosystems. The whole point of documentaries is to see animals’ natural behavior. The B.B.C has strict guidelines on what one can and cannot do while filming wild animals.
Piers Warren, founder of Filmmakers for Conservation, completely dismisses Mills arguments and says that it is impossible to say if an animal wants to be filmed or not. Animals have no concept of privacy. Animals don’t want to be around humans or other large predators. Hiding in a burrow is an act of preservation, not bashfulness. Even People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) states there was no harm in filming animals. They praised environmental documentaries by saying they increase people’s awareness of many spectacular species we share the planet with. The World Society for the Protection of Animals (WSPA)’s advisor also says that the concept of privacy is alien to wild animals.
I personally think the idea of animal privacy is sort of ridiculous. I agree with those people who have said that animals do not have a concept of privacy and that documentaries help towards environmental conservation. When people view the lives of endangered animals, I believe this gives them a reason to help protect the environment because by protecting the environment they are protecting beautiful and complex creatures. However, I only support filming of animals’ intimate moments for educational purposes not any for any kind of joking or ridiculing.
Sources:http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2010/apr/29/wildlife-films-infringe-privacy
http://www.wildlifeextra.com/go/news/animals-privacy.html#cr
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/7653305/Wildlife-documentaries-invade-animal-privacy-rights- claims-leading-academic.html
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)